South Africa’s credibility in the green transition hinges not only on technical readiness but on institutional integrity, writes Lionel Jean Michel
There are no sirens, no mushroom clouds, no overt cinematic fanfare to announce the unfolding of a new global transformation summarising South Africa.
This transformation does not erupt with dramatic spectacle; rather, it unfolds gradually, blending into everyday life. In Limpopo, the riverbeds lie parched and cracked, crawling with ants. Each movement is a subtle harbinger, echoing an ancient warning of environmental distress.
Meanwhile, in Gauteng, the city skyline flickers uncertainly, periodically plunged into darkness by recurring blackouts. These dark days disrupt daily routines and hint at deeper systemic vulnerabilities. Beyond the borders, a shipment of rare-earth minerals, essential for modern technologies, waits with uncertainty under a dirty tarpaulin at Mozambique’s frontier. Its destiny, a European battery plant, is stalled by regional discord, illustrating not only logistical challenges but the intricate web of geopolitical tensions shaping South Africa’s role in the global supply chain.
These are not separate incidents; they are early signs in our rapidly shifting geopolitics. South Africa, whether it realises it or not, is seated at the table of a new global contest. It is both player and pawn in a fractured “green” world where climate change is no longer a spectre but a daily, disruptive force. The rules are shifting. The battlegrounds extend beyond UN assemblies and Davos boardrooms. They scream from the copper belt, the Karoo, the corridors of Eskom, and the subterranean depths of miner-townships. The stakes are sovereignty, survival, and the very soul of a continent.
What is unfolding in South Africa is a narrative marked by high drama told in low tones. This is not a policy brief; it’s a geopolitical suspense story with the pacing of a novelist and the moral weight of a theologian. South Africa’s wager on sustainability is not a distant aspiration. It is playing out moment by moment, its urgency highlighted by the relentless countdown of a dying battery, symbolising both the nation’s energy crisis and the broader stakes for its future.
The country is graced with vast reserves of critical minerals: platinum-group metals (PGMs), vanadium, manganese, rare earth elements (REEs), and beyond. These are essential in worldwide transitions to clean energy, electric vehicles, hydrogen fuel, and advanced manufacturing. The Critical Minerals and Metals Strategy document (South Africa) maps this ambition. This articulates the sober reality: South Africa must stop exporting raw ore and become a technology supplier.
A Just Transition must be navigated—one that reconciles its internal socioeconomic divides with its aspiration for global leadership. It must do so while powerful actors, like China, the European Union, jockey for secure access to critical minerals and shape supply chains to their strategic advantage.
At the same time, local interest groups and cabals are manoeuvring to retain control and benefit from new opportunities arising from the transition to clean energy and advanced manufacturing.
Recently, the South African Cabinet approved the Integrated Resource Plan 2025 (IRP 2025): a R2.23 trillion blueprint that positions nuclear energy as a cornerstone of the nation’s energy future. After years of hesitation, nuclear is back on the table, not as a relic of Cold War ambition, but as a pragmatic solution to South Africa’s energy crisis and industrial aspirations.
The revival of the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR) project, an initiative once deemed South Africa’s most expensive R&D venture, is watched by critics with scepticism. Billions have been spent since 1994, and no commercial prototype has emerged. Adding to the concerns is the loss of expertise initially assembled for the PBMR programme. This includes a number of the original specialists and engineers who have since left the country to apply their skills abroad, further complicating any attempt to relaunch the project and raising questions about South Africa’s capacity to deliver on its nuclear ambitions.
Execution hinges on transparent financing, procurement discipline, and policy coherence, areas where previous green dreams have faltered. This nuclear pivot is not only about electrons. It is about industrialisation, localisation of supply chains, and reviving a decimated construction sector. It is a gamble, but the state insists otherwise and will not abandon mid-stream.
As South Africa readies itself for COP 29, on an environmental and geopolitical platform, the Global North continues to impose emissions targets. The Global South demands equity, finance, and acknowledgement of its developmental constraints. South Africa simply cannot just arrive at COP 29 with frameworks and government gobble de gook, but with a compelling narrative. One that defends its right to industrialise, insists on climate justice, and outlines how its Critical Minerals Strategy aligns with global decarbonisation.
“Just Transition” is no longer a slogan. It’s migrated to Litmus Test. Can South Africa decarbonise without deepening poverty? Can it deploy solar grids in townships while preserving biodiversity treaties? Can it meet international ESG standards without simply becoming a quarry of raw materials?
The American-based think tank on international affairs, the Atlantic Council, warns African nations against being reduced to “green quarries” unless they mitigate this risk by asserting their sovereignty and value addition. The Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) is equally stark: South Africa’s iron-ore, cobalt and gold reserves may be economically depleted within 50 years unless there is a decisive shift to a circular economy.
South Africa’s diplomatic dance at COP 29 is delicate. On one side sits the BRICS alliance, offering infrastructure deals with fewer governance strings. On the other hand, Western markets demand rigorous ESG compliance and traceability. The country must bridge both worlds: build township solar grids while navigating biodiversity treaties; attract investment without ceding control. This is a setting where climate change is not merely environmental; it is also geopolitical. It shapes trade routes, investment flows and diplomatic alliances.
The Critical Minerals Strategy is emblematic of South Africa’s attempt to seize the moment. It outlines immediate investment in exploration, value addition, energy security, and regional integration. It positions critical minerals not simply as sources of revenue but as instruments of geopolitical leverage.
But a strategy is only as good as its execution. Without bold and synchronised implementation, South Africa risks being sidelined in the global clean-energy economy.
Therefore, at Baka, South Africa must present a bold, actionable agenda that positions its Critical Minerals Strategy not merely as an economic tool but as a lever for climate justice and geopolitical influence. Central to this agenda is the obligation to link mineral beneficiation directly to climate finance. By advocating for scaled-up support for its Just Transition, it can ensure that the value derived from its critical minerals is not just exported but reinvested to support an equitable and sustainable energy transition at home. This approach highlights the need to integrate beneficiation with robust financial backing, enabling the country to move beyond being a mere supplier of raw materials.
Furthermore, South Africa has a unique opportunity to showcase its energy pivot, particularly its renewed focus on nuclear energy within a coherent and comprehensive sustainability framework—a wonderful opportunity to demonstrate how its policy choices are aligned with both global decarbonisation targets and domestic industrial development, reinforcing its case for climate justice and equitable growth.
This approach strengthens South Africa’s argument for climate justice, as it asserts the country’s right to pursue economic growth and industrial progress while contributing to global emissions reduction efforts. The integration of these dual objectives demonstrates its commitment to achieving an equitable transition that does not sacrifice domestic priorities for international expectations, but rather seeks to harmonise both for the benefit of its people and the global community. South Africa can now move from the periphery to the centre of global climate negotiations.
The minerals beneath its soil must fuel a renaissance, not become relics of missed opportunity. Execution, not intention, will define its legacy. However, bold agendas mean little without structural readiness. South Africa’s mineral wealth may offer geopolitical leverage, but its domestic architecture, from labour relations to procurement governance, remains fragile. The promise of beneficiation and green reindustrialisation cannot be realised without confronting the social tensions and institutional failures that undermine execution. Climate justice is not just about minerals and megawatts; it is about workers, communities, and the integrity of public systems.
South Africa simply cannot exit COP 29 without proving that its transition is not only visionary but viable, built on inclusive planning, clean governance, and a workforce equipped for the future.
Back home, the fault lines required rapid closing if the country is to lead, not lag, in the global climate economy. The just energy transition is not merely technical; it is profoundly social. Labour unions such as NUM, NUMSA, and Solidarity continue to remain divided on the pace and terms of the Just Transition, with tensions mounting overcompensation, retraining, and job security.
Automation and AI are viewed with suspicion, not as tools for modernisation but as threats to livelihoods. This resistance slows the adoption of smart mining and renewable systems, even as global competitors surge ahead. Workers are routinely excluded from early policy design, informed only once decisions are made, a recipe for mistrust and industrial action. The skills mismatch is stark: TVET colleges and SETAs lag behind the demands of digital energy systems and advanced manufacturing. Without a coherent labour strategy, fragmented union-state alignment risks derailing the climate transition altogether.
The social equity paradox looms large. Climate policy may promise sustainability, but without embedded resettlement and enterprise support, coal-belt communities face economic displacement. Green jobs must be more than slogans; They require structured pathways, inclusive planning, and enforceable guarantees.
Energy and infrastructure tenders from Eskom’s renewables, to nuclear contracts, remain opaque, vulnerable to inflated bids, shell intermediaries, and political interference.
Elite capture is a growing threat: beneficiation initiatives risk being monopolised by politically connected entities, eroding public trust and deterring legitimate investors. Fragmented procurement across departments, state-owned entities (SOEs), and municipalities enables manipulation of contract values and delivery timelines. Even when audits expose irregularities, weak forensic follow-up means few convictions and little reform.
The country cannot continue to be plagued by a procurement landscape where corruption is not an exception but a recurring cost centre, a persistent challenge permeating critical processes, inflating costs, undermining trust, and diverting resources away from genuine development. If South Africa is to realise its ambitious sustainability and industrialisation goals, this entrenched corruption must be confronted directly and decisively.
Furthermore, policy capture compounds the crisis. Industrial strategies are often rewritten through “consultative workshops” dominated by corporate lobbyists, sidelining independent experts and civil society, undermining accountability and distorting developmental priorities.
South Africa’s credibility in the green transition hinges not only on technical readiness but on institutional integrity. Without procurement reform and political will, the country risks financing its own stagnation, one tender at a time.
This is not a story of despair. It is a story of possibility. But possibility demands courage. Leadership requires more than eloquent statements; it demands action. A nation unwilling to act becomes a footnote in history.
Lionel Jean Michel is a journalist, integrated communications specialist, and thought leader
www.leadershiponline.co.za |