Friday, September 03, 2010

Kill the boer

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Malema_2Who really is attempting to rewrite history?

Is the controversial song urging the killing of “Boers” truly part of the ANC’s liberation struggle heritage, or are such claims simply an ingenuous, or perhaps sinister, attempt by the ANC leadership to defend its Youth League leader Julius Malema by distorting the historical truth? Or is the ANC itself trying to rewrite history after it accused the courts of doing so when two successive court rulings found the song to incite racial hatred – findings in line with one already made by the Human Rights Commission (HRC) as long ago as 2003?

These are questions that come to the fore from an investigation into the origins of the controversial song, "Dubula iBhunu".

The truth seems to be that words to the same effect first were chanted in Pan-Africanist Congress (PAC) circles in the early 1990s along with their infamous slogan of “one settler, one bullet”. Shortly thereafter, the late ANC youth leader Peter Mokaba borrowed the slogan and began chanting his “kill the Boer, kill the farmer” version in 1993 after the murder of ANC and Communist Party leader, Chris Hani.

In none of the sources on the origins of the song which could be identified, could any indication be found that the song has ever been part of the ANC repertoire of songs during the struggle days.

Although the controversial song sung by Malema is claimed now to be a historical liberation struggle song, it was not included in a 2-CD history and recording of 25 freedom songs released in 2002. Senior ANC and former Umkhonto we Sizwe leaders, including Ronnie Kasrils, Baleka Mbete and Pallo Jordan among others, had collaborated in the production of the collection.

At the time of its release, the CD set was described as a collection of field recordings of songs and chants used in the liberation struggle, complemented by a radio documentary providing an overview of the songs, their history and context in the struggle. These songs were sung in ANC camps, at meetings, mass rallies, demonstrations and other gatherings.

The set, it was said, was designed as an archival and historical document. Nowhere did it mention “kill the Boer, kill the farmer” or “shoot the Boer”.

All indications are that the slogan or chant and the song, or even songs that developed from it, originated with the Pan Africanist Congress (PAC).

In August 1999, Thomas Ramaila told the Truth and Reconciliation Commission that he had been a PAC operative and had been influenced by what he called a PAC slogan, namely “kill the farmer, kill the Boer” to kill a farmer, Neville Rudman. Most of Ramaila’s testimony and his amnesty application were rejected, but his reference to the slogan was not.

The slogan/song in any version was used first in circles associated with the PAC in the early 1990s, although the PAC never officially took ownership of it and, after the first democratic elections of 1994, distanced itself from it. At almost the same time, the ANC’s Mokaba began using the slogan in 1993 when the armed struggle for all intents and purposes was a thing of the past.

In that same year, a large crowd of PAC supporters marched through Cape Town’s Kenilworth and Claremont suburbs, demanding the release of PAC members who had been arrested in connection with the massacre of 11 churchgoers at the St. James Church and chanted “kill the Boer, kill the farmer”, “one settler, one bullet” and “one church, one bomb”.

Also in 1993, at a rally in Tembisa near Johannesburg, both Mokaba and a PAC representative used these or similar words in speeches to the large crowd. Mokaba reportedly also urged the crowd to direct their “bullets” at then president FW de Klerk, declaring that he hated De Klerk. To which the PAC representative added, “war against the enemy... kill them”.

In March this year, a former participant in an August 1993 march (called “Operation Barcelona”) against increased exam fees in Cape Town, wrote in a comment to an article on the Internet, that he was among PASO (PAC student wing) students in the march who chanted “kill the Boer, kill the farmer” immediately before American student Amy Biehl was killed by members of that mob.

In 2002, then president Thabo Mbeki, as president of the ANC, and in 2003 then ANC secretary-general Kgalema Motlanthe - who is now ANC deputy president - firmly and unambiguously distanced the ANC from any such song or slogan, saying it had never been, and would never be, a part of the ANC. No claim was made then that it – in any form - ever had been an ANC liberation struggle song.

That is until now, when, in March this year, Malema began singing a generic version of Mokaba’s chant. Suddenly senior ANC leaders, among them secretary-general Gwede Mantashe, are claiming this to be an old ANC liberation struggle song that apparently never was sung to incite violence against white farmers or whites in general, but was aimed against the apartheid regime.

Mcebisi Ndletyana, senior researcher at the Human Science Research Council - in another defence of the song and attack on the judges who ruled against its use in an article in "The Sunday Independent" - claims the song embodies black hatred of “whiteness”, but not of people of European descent... with a very wooly explaination of what the difference is intended to be.

No documentary or other evidence could be found that the chant or related songs were indeed ANC liberation songs before 1993, when the liberation struggle was practically over and constitutional negotiations in full swing.

The Mokaba chant of “kill the farmer, kill the Boer” was next heard in June 2002 at an ANC Youth League meeting in Kimberley, and at Mokaba’s funeral in Limpopo. The funeral was attended by prominent ANC leaders, including Nelson Mandela and Mbeki, and the chanting was stopped immediately.

The Freedom Front lodged a complaint of hate speech with the HRC, which subsequently rejected it. However Mbeki, as president of the ANC and the country at the time, on 19 June of that year told Parliament: “Nobody in our country has a right to call for the killing of any South African, whatever the colour, race, ethnic origin, gender or health condition of the intended victim. Those farmers and boers are as much South African and African as I am...”

In June 2003, the HRC, chaired by Professor Karthy Govender, assisted by Professor Henk Botha and Mr Khashane Manamela, heard an appeal by the Freedom Front against the earlier HRC ruling. In their decision, delivered on 15 July, they overturned the earlier HRC ruling and found that the slogan "Kill the farmer, kill the boer" as chanted at the ANC youth rally in Kimberley and at the funeral of  Mokaba constituted hate speech as defined in section 16(2)(c) of the Constitution.

What is even more interesting is that part of the record of submissions made to the HRC at the time contains a letter from Motlanthe, then ANC secretary-general, stating that the ‘’utterance has never been, cannot and will never be a slogan of the ANC, not used by the ANC at all.’’ The logical assumption then is that, according to Motlanthe, it was not part of the ANC’s liberation struggle heritage.

 

Comments (49)
  • Henning  - Spread message
    How can we bring this message to the forefront of the current discussion? It is essential for everyone to know these facts, and Gwede Mantashe etc. needs to be exposed / confronted publicly.
  • anthony  - Wheres the President, really!
    Yes but how, where's our Zuma, our President - do you think the situation would have got this turbulent had Mandela been president, or for that matter anyone with more than a matric. Where is he... this is serious stuff.
    This has only happened because we have a half educated tribal leader leading a complex knowledge based society - He's decision making is emotional and has not got the education base to make quick and wise decisions as he doesn't understand the structures, mechanisms and forces - the economics/phycology of this modern society, unless he does and he's allowing for it to pan out how it will, and contributing his voice minimally, strategically.
  • Marius  - Publish this article in all the Newspapers.
    Excellent article and exposing the ignorance and deliberate incitement that the mutant virus called Malema is trying to spread.
  • Marius  - Permission to spread this article
    Could the writer consider giving permission for all and sundry to spread this article to enable everyone to access this invaluable information.
  • Angaas  - Tacit Approval
    Julius Malema & Eugene Terre'Blanche are so similar in that the size of their minds is (was) extremely small. They appeal to a lunatic fringe whose rantings reach all. The "future leader" as Zuma calls him, will be the splitting of the ANC. Will that be a good or bad thing, who knows? The ANC had a wealth of good leaders and promptly chose one whose mind is limited to belt height. Yes well no fine
  • laager
    Angaas - do you understand Afrikaans?
    Did you ever listen to any of ET's speeches?

    Simply stated what he said was:

    The Afrikaners have a right to their own territory
    Remember they had their two Republics which the British took away from them in 1902

    The Afrikaners have a right to self determination
    They had previously achieved this through the Great Trek and having to fight the Matabele, Zulu. Sotho and British along the way to achieve it

    The Afrikaners did not want to be ruled by blacks
    The Afrikaners did not believe that majority rule was the correct route forward for South Africa
    The Afrikaners do not want to rule the blacks.
    That is what the homelands policy was trying to achieve
    Self determination for the 9 black nations of southern Africa

    Now why do you describe that as the "lunatic fringe"?
    In the UK, Scotland and Wales are campaigning for exactly the same dispensation
    They already have clearly defined territories
    They already have their own legislatures
    They now seek greater autonomy from Westminster
    In Ireland the Unionists are campaigning for the 6 counties to be re-united with the Republic and to be free of British control.

    Why is it that when Afrikaners campaign for the same rights they are labeled as neo-nazis, facists, white supremacists, the far right lunatic fringe?
    Why is it that the pc-left-wing-liberals take it upon themselves to persistently criticise the Afrikaners for what is considered a perfectly legitimate human right anywhere else in the world?
  • Chris Potgieter  - Home lands
    @ Laager,
    I am an Afrikaner. My family links go back to Jan Harmse Potgieter. The fact is that the aspirations of those living in the British Isles are of little concern to me. One should only cut ones cloth according to the country in which one resides.
    It is time for all South Africans to considered the facts that we have more in common with each other than that which some choose to put forward as to why we should live in these separate states.
    Above all, debate whether you will find these states after death or for that matter before birth.
    My Afrikaner familie is meestal met Engels sprekende Suid Afrikaners getroud. Baie van hulle het hul kinders as Engelse sprekend groot gemaak omdat die klat van verdelings so swaar op ware Afrikaners se gemoedere geweeg het.
    Forget about the establishment of an Afrikanerstand. It will never happen.
  • Mourning Democracy  - Home lands
    Chris,

    There is no "klat (sic)" (dit is klad) in the separation, which was the original intention of apartheid because the Boere recognized that the blacks' religious beliefs were corrosive to the Judeo-Christian values, which the Dutch Settlers brought with them. The post apartheid era proves they were right.

    The whites made mistakes as their struggle shifted from the religious-ideological to the political-ideological when the ANC created MK with the support of the USSR. Then it became not only a struggle of the hearts and minds of the people, but it became a struggle of violence, murder of blacks and whites, and intimidation.

    What did anyone expect would happen other than that the two opposing forces would align by race? If the blacks did not join the ANC, they were necklaced. If they did they were in the cross-hairs of the defense force. With one exception: the Christian blacks were solidly with the Christian whites and with defiance of the opposing communists, they survived. They, the Christians, more than any other group, were responsible for the breakdown of apartheid's racist overtones it acquired as the war brought more separation.

    Initially, and the homelands were proof of that, apartheid sought equal opportunity for all races, each ruling themselves. It started on the wrong foot when the people were classified into "white", "black" and "colored" people. Those who were not European or Negro, were Colored, which caught those of mixed race, Chinese and Indian, among others. In 1955 the Coloreds were removed from the voters' roles, which was perhaps the biggest mistake the National Party made next to the classification of the races.

    Now the country had people divided into groups that separated Christians, which is an egregious violation of God's Word, a foundation of the Afrikaner's culture. The Gereformeerde Kerk in the 1960/70's were politically chastised for stating that there is no racial separation within the church when they allowed blacks to study in their seminaries with full pulpit privileges on an equal footing with the whites. History proved them correct.

    So, if you want to talk about a blot, it is not the separation, per se, that is blotted, it is the racism, and even fascism, that crept in, primarily when the ANC went military against the ideology. Don't get me wrong, I am not laying the blame at the feet of the ANC for all the wrongs of the past, but putting the blacks in a vise of life-and-death type politics, with the extermination of all whites as their goal, deliberately creating a chasm that exists even today; using it to flame hatred with chants keeping the chasm as deep and impenetrable as ever before.

    The ANC is the architect of the divide along the lines of race by casting blacks as communists and the whites as oppressors. Hence, kill the Boer chant, which is a chant designed to transpose those old ideologies to the youth who do not have the knowledge of history to correctly judge the danger and horror of the ANC's motives. If the ANC were to subject themselves to fair elections based on policies derived from the arena of ideas, they will lose any election in a land-slide. It is evident that they dare not abandon chants like this or their intimidation of their own people.

    Julius is not seeking counsel from Mugabe for no good reason. There are rumors floating around that the Chinese will supply the ANC with weapons through Zimbabwe so they can be ready once the whites succumb to the provocation you see today, and strike first. The provocation will only intensify, which is why the propaganda war will have to be planned carefully, skillfully, and executed with precision by experts. Not politicians.

    You cannot say that an Afrikaner Staat will never happen. If Afrikaners are willing to live in their own geographical area and make a go of it, who are you or I to deny them that? Provided they don't mandate that those with a white skin are obligated to live there, they are free to pursue their own homeland. Only those who choose to live there, will.

    The problem I am glad I won't be called on to resolve is how they would maintain that they act according to the Bible but not allow Christians of other skin colors to become citizens of that homeland. Practically, I don't think it is doable because they will forever be at the mercy of the government in Pretoria, if not legally, then practically.

    Rather fight for the Constitution that is in place right now. It provides protection for all if it is enforced properly. It is based on the Judeo-Christian principles on which the Unites States of America were founded, which produce universal liberty and prosperity for all. Then choose to associate with whom you please, which seems to be the most practical solution.
  • Lara Zhivago  - Why don't you tell Kosovo?
    Chris..

    thanks for telling us you are God, and you have decided we cannot have a volkstaat. Pray, why did you give Kosovo permission, or was that because NATO said they would nuke you?
  • Geoffrey van Wyk
    @laager,

    Because you took the whole country to yourself and treated the other peoples like dirt. DUH!
  • Mourning Democracy  - Treating others like dirt
    Geoffrey is the typical uninformed and unwilling to inform himself pontificator. If you would educate yourself, you would know that the Afrikaner NEVER took slaves (just to clear that matter up) because of the Dutch Settlers unwavering belief in Judeo-Christian principles. I remember my folks having the workers join us in the living room during evening worship because they were aware what the Bible taught about the Apostle Peter and Timothy. You may want to read it up some day. The Afrikaners bought their land from its owners, properly registered in the Castle in Cape Town. No one was driven from their land, a lie that the ANC is eager to spread to fuel their fires of violence and war.

    It was when the British invaded the Cape that a class system was introduced and non-British people were regarded as 2nd class citizens, whites and blacks.

    The ANC willingly joined the Communists and took money and support from the USSR; not because of oppression, but because of the whites' belief in the God of Abraham and Isaac and Jacob, which they hated or didn't know. The Afrikaners didn't believe in ancestral spirits and muti-killings for medicine. That's why. But the ANC wanted nothing other than complete capitulation by the whites. Several times missions into Africa to negotiate a constitutional solution to the violence were sent back empty handed because they insisted on capitulation, which was unacceptable. The ANC firmly believed that, with the support from the USSR and Cuba, an invasion of SA would be imminent.

    P.W. Botha in June 1986 had to choose between announcing talks with the ANC, which would have meant accepting the premise of capitulation, or resisting the U.N. P.W. had no choice and announced states of emergency in several areas. Only after Ronald Reagan caused the collapse of the USSR, did the ANC's funding and Cuban support dry up. They literally scrambled to get Pretoria back to the negotiating table to talk about a constitutional settlement, which is what SA has today.

    From the beginning the whites feared that a one-man-one-vote system would dilute their Judeo-Christian culture, which is why they started planning the tuislande two years after the NP won the elections in 1948. It was communist pressure in the UN that refused to recognize the tuislande as legitimate independent countries while the entire world's ethnic groups at the time sought and received recognition as independent, sovereign states. Not the whites, or should I say, not the Judeo-Christian people of South Africa. Why not? The ANC already found resonating rhetoric with the socialism that was gaining great momentum in the UN and is still gaining ground all over the world.

    The Afrikaners' fears were legitimate after all. Look at what you have in SA today: out of control violence, more people in poverty than ever before, less housing, less schooling, less liberty, more control and intimidation of the population – all the things the whites feared and fought against. When the leaders joke at being the most violent country in the world outside of a war zone, and even in some war zones, you have a problem on your hands, Geoffrey van Wyk, a problem not brought about by the Afrikaners but by the communists we fought and negotiated with.

    Just like Israel, who fights an enemy who doesn't recognize its right to exist, so the Afrikaner fights an enemy that doesn't recognize our right to exist. Any negotiation, any compromise, is just another small victory in their quest to complete annihilation.

    I think the Afrikaner, who acknowledges that mistakes were made in the past, has reached the point where the provocation of the ANC to trick them into violence against the state, just like the British has done that led to the 1899 war, would not fool them again.

    Your lack of knowledge is so apparent, Geoffrey, that you ought to be ashamed of yourself. You must be a product of the new-deal school system, which inflicts great injustices on the youth.


  • Mourning Democracy  - ANC Struggle
    The ANC celebrates their victory over apartheid as their 'struggle.' Firstly, they didn't win anything with their struggle. They were outfoxed by South Africa and losing ground because of their refusal to come to the negotiating table. It was only the incompetence of Theuns Eloff that gave Cyril Ramaphosa the edge to play him like a fiddle during the negotiations, which failed to bring home a better settlement.

    The ANC's struggle was an abject failure measured against any struggle. The problemm is not beating the communists, the problem is how much blood is it going to take.

    Our only weapon is our Judeo-Christian principles and we better define ourselves before they do. Capturing the hearts and minds of the people, black and white, before blood flows, in defense, not aggression, would be key.

    Let them make the mistakes. They are already stacking up the mistakes.

  • Gerda van Brakel  - Don't Generalise!
    Geoffrey VAN WYK! Be careful not to generalise. Your surname is as Afrikaans as the people you claim treated the "other people" like dirt. When push comes to shove, you will be seen as just another BOER. They will not ask questions about how you feel about the old apartheid era etc. So don't go pointing fingers in all directions. I am Afrikaans (and proud of it)and NEVER! did any of my family treat any of "the other people" like dirt. My grandfather was a farmer who built houses for his farm workers(proper houses not these RDP sh@t! the government call houses)and I fondly remember Christmas at the farm where we had a huge Christmas party with food, presents, cake and sweets for the FARM WORKERS! Some even attended his funeral years later to pay their respects. We do the best we can to help the poor (black and white) but we don't have billions like the government. So please think before you make such ill-considered remarks.
  • ntokozo  - unity is power
    people lets stop discriminating other people based on their skin colors. we all South Africans. white,black, coloured and indians but we all South Africans. remember we are the image of God. lets show the world that we are proudly South Africans. with love and peace, cheers
  • Mourning Democracy  - Ntokozo - unity is power
    I commend you for your position. It's exactly what should be done to save the country. Sadly, however, that's not the issue.

    It's the age-old struggle of communism against western culture (at least what was the western culture) of liberty and prosperity for all.

    There will be no peace until the people reject communism because communists recognize no authority but that of communism, which has caused the death, impoverishment and imprisonment of more people than any other ideology in history.

    So, if you want peace in South Africa, join those who combat communism and socialism. The South African Constitution is already founded on Judeo-Christian principles, which is the only economic-moral model ever to produce universal liberty and prosperity. And, you don't have to believe in Judaism or Christianity to practice it and enjoy its fruits.

    Defend the constitution and defeat communism and what you wrote could well come true.

    As a black guy, judging solely by your name here, you have the liberty and opportunity to pursue the goal of peace if you can withstand the intimidation of the communists. I firmly believe, and have always been of the opinion that you represent the position of the majority of black people in South Africa.

    There is hope.
  • Anonymous  - Geoffrey has no clue about history
    I don't know where your from ,but if you know any thing about history ,you will see that the whites never sold the blacks in to slavery ,the blackens sold the blacks in to slavery..second
    the British did the same to the Irish ..and have its colaneys
    the Spaniards to the same to the native Aztec Indians .
    The Americans did the same to the Native
    Indians / Eskimos / Hawaii's /
    Australia the Aboriginals
    I can keep going on and on about all the hypocritical country's the Europeans included ..Big time
    South Africa is the only country that has been more then fair about trying to make right!
  • Paul Naude
    I really thought that we were talking about an old struggle song/chant.. Thank you very much for clearing the matter up. Now it's clear to me that Malemas only objective is to turn the SA dream into a nightmare, mainly I believe, to cover up his illegal financial gain. For me 2010 will be remembered as the year of "THE MALEMA DILEMA"
  • STUART SCULLY  - Thanks for clearing that up !
    I myself, while no politician, was wondering about the origins of this so called "Freedom Song". I was trying to remember when I first heard it. It seems this is another occasion where the media have failed to expose inaccuracies being purported as facts. It is high time for a newspaper that reports the 'FACTS". Properly researched and backed up with evidence. Or are they too frightened? It seems such a pity that while by no means perfect, and with the violent crime situation excluded, ordinary South Africans of all colors seemed to be getting on remarkably well considering our history. Then along comes a fool(and a dangerous one at that!) and starts chanting, what any sane minded person,(and THREE court rulings) can only describe as "Hate Speech".The singing of which, some believe, was the cause of ET's demise.

    Even if nothing at all happens, even if there are no reprisals, the ill feeling this has caused will last for years, possibly forever. What a pity, all over a so called ANC "Freedom Song" that never was. What a waste of life, what an idiotic thing to do. Just when we were starting to get on track. Do the ANC actually want peace and stability? It makes you think, doesn't it?
  • Anonymous  - Lets move on
    The struggle is over, the people are liberated. Why the need to sing so-called liberation songs? Cant we build a new nation together without hatred? C'mon guys we have a wonderful country, lets not destroy everything we have fought for.
  • Mxolisi  - Unity is power
    How I wish every South African wanted the same.
  • Mourning Democracy  - Let's move on
    It's because it's not about building a new nation for he ruling class. Read my response to "Ntokozo - unity is power" a few comments above this.
  • James  - @ laager
    The fact that 5% of the population occcupied something like 80% of the land, can't see that happening in the UK, Scotland or Wales nor could I ever image they would have "Dompas" in which to control and rule the Blacks.
    Yes in his speeches he did say what he stated but that was politcal talk, he never had the best interest of 95% of the population (all non-white) and found what positives he could to sugar coat what was actually a racist plan in which to control and to mistreat people and a race in general whom he in his own mind far superior. If you so willingly defend Apartheid then you are either someone who has only a few facts of what really happened and are just trying to sound like you really understand what Apartheid was when actually you don't or you are twisted enough to defend the actions Hitler or Starlin took!
  • hazeid  - like poles!
    funny in that julius and et are more alike and similar in thoughts but only in opposite directions. julius portrays black supremacy whilst et white supremacy. julius appeals to the poor and uneducated, similar to et. julius can only gain popularity by being inflammatory in his speeches, et used to do the same.
  • Samier  - Dont you just LOVE to HATE Malema
    I am no fundi in politics but when i heard Malema on the radio for the 1st talk about school and education and new he was going to be a cook that loves to stir.
  • Ryan Peter  - Great research and journalism
    Now this article is what I call good journalism. Thank you! Pity that I can't see who wrote the article, but thank you nevertheless for the excellent research.
  • Anonymous #2  - Contradiction
    It's very strange to see, that numerous people actually think Malema is very similar to ET, and I agree. He is so "determined" to get rid of racism in SA, that in his own actions, he himself has become one. And I doubt he even knows it. He fears white domination. Why? Has he got any reason to fear white people? The white folks that I've met, and spent time with have been nothing but friendly, and openhearted. They've treated me and all others as they would any other guests, And I've experienced this throughout SA.

    The biggest thing that I've noticed as far as racism goes, is that the ones that are racist, have (according to what I've witnessed) reason to be. And if they aren't racist, their just stereotyping. Families that have been robbed, murdered and raped are afraid, because they obviously don't want it to happen again. They're scared of certain people (whichever color) because they have been traumatized due to past experiences.

    Now take a look, and think about this. It's been a few years since the Apartheid era ended, and the people that actually LIVED through those times are either very old, or deceased. Yes there are many still alive, like Zuma, Mbeki and Mandela, but given those three people, all have different ideas, views and opinions regarding our nation, it's history and it's future. The people now a days are young, and misled. They are easily converted to whichever side promises them the most rewards. SA might as well be the old USSR, because propaganda is being spread in broad day light, and people don't even see it. They are so blinded by false prophesying and lies, and their own fears that they only see what they want to. Unfortunately in most cases, the only thing people see, is the differences in skin color.

    History is exactly what it states: HISTORY. What happened in the past, should stay there. Why should people try and turn the tides, where-as South Africa in itself is a beautiful country. Make the most of what we have, before everything is lost. Some say history will repeat itself. But is that really what we want? Can't we just write our own history/future, and start building together, a country that used to be called "the land of milk and honey".

    We've had numerous world cup events hosted in our beloved country, and the biggest one is yet to come. Why can't the population of this country stand together, as they did with the 1995 Rugby World Cup. That was truly a memorable time in our country's history, where everyone stood together, regardless of race, sexual orientation or anything that shows each and every one of us apart. I am special just like everyone else, but it is our home that joins us. Blood may be thicker than water, but soil is pretty damn thick if you ask me!

    Let's hope and pray that everything turns out for the best. For our country, our children, and our future.
  • andrew  - ROLE MODEL LEADERSHIP
    This is what you get when we have a person, who never mind basic tertiary education, doesn't even have a matric... as HEAD of State / PRESIDENT / "The Ultimate National Decision Maker".
  • Gugu
    I find this misrepresentation of facts and history quite disturbing. As former member of Azanyu, a former PAC youth movement, I do not recall PAC members especially in the late 80's and early 90's ever shouting the slogan "Kill the Boer, kill the Farmer". On the Contrary, growing up in Soweto and being part of the student movement, I can categorically say this was a slogan of ANC aligned youth formations, such as Cosas. "One Settler on Bullet" was a PAC slogan and reflected the PAC position on Settle colonialism. It is also on record that the PAC stopped using this slogan a couple of years ago. Attempts to rubbish the PAC's legacy and attribute to it ANC slogans is a bit opportunistic and an attempt to cleans the ANC of its so called "unsavoury past". Profiling the PAC, the first organisation in the 50's to ascribe to the principle of non-racialism, will not help the ANC to come out of its own created mess. Just don't spread untruths to carry favour with ANC.
  • Mourning Democracy  - Gugu & PAC
    Gugu, thank you for a civil response. You seem to be a person with whom one can debate the issues.

    You are right, the PAC was the first to use the settler slogan and I cannot remember that it ever used the Kill the Boer slogan.

    The PAC has never been non-racist because One Settler One Bullet is a racist chant. My ancestors were in Africa in 1687 when only the Khoi-Khoi lived there. So, a Settler was tipified by the PAC as the Europeans and ignoring the blacks that migrated south after we got there. I don't have a problem with that migration, but using your template, it's the color of our skins that makes us settlers. How far do you want to go back in history?

    If you read the blogs where blacks predominantly hang out, you see racism and it's fueled by Julius and the PAC.

    That the PAC stopped using the chant a couple of years ago is news to me, good news, I must add, but it has already spawned the seeds of whites as settlers and that they deserve a bullet each. The ANCYL took that cue and recast it into Kill the Boer. As the first user of chants and stated policy to annihilate a particular kind of people, lies at the feet of the PAC as much as it does at the feet of the ANC.

    You cannot clear yourself from that obligation. I write elsewhere in this blog about the real reason that there is no peace in the country; a reason of which you are a victim.
  • Youth of 'New' South Africa  - No Offence
    I was born in 1984 so I've been exposed to "the struggle" without ever being in it and I don't mean to offend anyone that was involved, but as someone who has grown up in the "new" south africa, I'm really bored with the whole concept. For the last 26 years all I've heard is politic parties, government and the media use the 'struggle' and 'apartheid' to blame, use it as an excuse and use it to get their way.
    It's getting old.
    This article is great to get the facts straight and I've found the comments highly interesting. My personal viewpoint, however, is, learn from the past and lets rather concentrate on the future and the now. People must get over their issues and the longer we make this an issue the longer people are going to use it. Let’s stop discussing how south africa got such a large poverty population and rather discuss how we are going to fix it. All that is happening now is people are using the blame game to get popularity, without actually helping anyone - they are just dividing us. Language, Culture, Colour, Class, anything so we keep looking at each other rather than looking at them.
    And no offence to all of you, but I'm tired of looking at you. I reckon its time we looked at them....
  • brains  - big headed, big brained, short sighted
    In contrast I think both were very intelligent, both clever tacticians, but both not realizing and/or not caring that they are doing a lot more damage to the stability of our society which has been fought for - that is through peaceful and legal means.
    Both lack/ed proper education and both are addicted to the power rush they feel when delivering their hate speech and warmongering.

    Both are arrogant and full of themselves, just that Malema is much more dangerous as he is current(as opposed to AWB and its leader being basically of insignificant influence) has a much greater following, and that is with the majority group of people in this country(black)
    He should be seriously fired from his position and given a good talking to coz if he doesn't get that this country is screwed.
  • anthony  - Big headed, big brained, short sighted, no sighted
    In contrast I think both were very intelligent, both clever tacticians, but both not realizing and/or not caring that they are doing a lot more damage to the stability of our society which has been fought for - that is through peaceful and legal means.
    Both lack/ed proper education and both are addicted to the power rush they feel when delivering their hate speech and warmongering.

    Both are arrogant and full of themselves, just that Malema is much more dangerous as he is current(as opposed to AWB and its leader being basically of insignificant influence) has a much greater following, and that is with the majority group of people in this country(black)
    He should be seriously fired from his position and given a good talking to coz if he doesn't get that this country is screwed.
  • ntokozo
    u ryt. lets unite and be one. here comes the world cup so lets join hands and shout BAFANA BAFANA as we did with AMABHOKOBHOKO.FEEL IT, IT'S HERE!!!
  • Chris  - Youth of 'New' South Africa - No offence taken
    I love the way the new generation is moving on, this instills hope in me. Hope that the politicians will not have such a strong hold / influence on them, bedazzling them with 'hidden agenda's masquerading as principles'.

    All I know is that politicians are chess players the have a few moves they have learned and a few new ones to try out. The best one is called diversion as previously said.

    Tswhane mayor tried to divert attention from their financial dilemma by re-inciting a name change. Malema is not doing much different.

    Please remember politicians are only as powerful as you allow them. Lets move on and continue building a better SA for all.

    Cheers - I'm back to my work. (creating work for others) ;-)
  • BOB
    Help me on the following..
    1."The two allegedly attacked the 69-year-old far-right wing leader because they were not paid for work they did." It is said that there were an argument between them. Q- why did they enter trough the window they had broken, and not the door??
    Q-Why did they argue in his bedroom and not the livin room??
    2. "His body was found at about 18:00. According to a report on Fromtheold****, Terre'Blanche was apparently still alive when police got to him but later died." Q- who found him?? Q- What was the police doing there, curtacy call??
    3. "A 16-year-old and 21-year-old who apparently worked for Terre'Blanche were arrested, police spokesperson Captain Adéle Myburgh said." Q- apparently??
    Q- Why did the murderers not flee?? Were they waiting to spend their night in jail??
    Q- Who employes a 15 year old, maybee he washed his car?
  • Gerda
    These questions are on everybody's lips. As a 15 year old he will not be tried as an adult and will probably be released into the care of his parents. Why did they hand over themselves so willingly? Because they thought they were heroes? I received a very disturbing email this week containing photo's of men, women and children murdered on farms. Women raped and broomsticks shoved..., disembowelment, children stabbed and strangled!!! In your worst nightmares you cannot imagine what is being done to people in this country. I could not even finnish reading the email. We only see headlines: Another Farm murder, but you do not see behind the curtains. They will not let you. My heart goes out to the policemen who has to record these murder scenes, and can understand why some of them attemp suicide. Wake up South Africans! Balck and white!! We are heading for disaster if the heads of state wish to keep quite as they are doing. As long as they are stocking up their own pockets today, they don't care about tomorrow. It scares and saddens me because we really cpuld be living in the land of milk and honey, not blood and war.
  • Oh my gosh im white  - Julius Malema
    You know after seeing all thats going on it makes me think... Julius Malema is being setup or is being stupid. I think ET's killers are innocent and are being setup. But why now.. he's been out for how long? The thing is how come is this all happing before the world cup? I love this contry, love the people. The problem is you will always have racists idoits. Its all over the world. But its time now for the goverment to get rid of Julius Malema, fire him or whatever... but he needs to go. The next is to clamp down on these racists idoits. Track them down and make an example of them. The song Dubula iBhunu should be banned. As a white english south african I find the song very offensive. Look what happend in the Aparthied was wrong. Ok people shouldnt be treated like that, however that happened how long ago... Forgive and move on. If a War between white and black breaks here... England and America will pull in and take over SA and Zim. SA will be worst off than zim. It will be a war zone. It will look like Iraq and Afghanistan. Our economey will fall. Bang - no jobs - no money - no food. We need to stand together as South africans, White or Black, doen'st matter what your skin colour is. The bottom line is it starts with us. We need to make a change. Our leaders have let us down. So its up to the people of SA to unite and stand up for our people and our contry.
  • Yolande  - Julius Malema: PAC and not ANC
    The PAC stands for Pan-africansims this mean:
    "The demands that riches of Africa be used for benefit and uplifment, development and enjoyment of Africa people. According to them white People are Europeans. My opinion is that Julius is playing a double role here! The fact that the history of Sharpville was almost a fight between the parties must have been an eye blind for the rest of South Africa. I wonder what Julius Malema have on President Zuma? Might be something to do with the weapon transaction scandal. The President is just to quite and this might be the reason the ANC does not have controle over the ANC youth and their leader.
  • South African - Farther, Husba  - Interesting
    First of all, thank you for a very interesting article and discussion.

    Being blameful, sarcastic, racist, or blatantly un-informed are sometimes troublesome. I have been living in South Africa for the past 40 years and a lot of things have changed (as you all know). An old generation of South Africans mixed with the new are sharing the same geographical space.

    New ideas, mixed with the old, youth excelling in their ambition, and the old refraining from over-impulsive actions. This is the reality of life!

    When you look at the law of averages you find that there will always be -20% and +20% with the masses 60% somewhere in between. It is also interesting that it is this FIGHT for the 60% that gets our blood pumping.

    This is what is happening in SA at the moment. The propaganda (from ANC for the blacks and AWB for the whites) is to mobilise the 60% for some sort of action. This is my concern: Why is this mobilization taking place from the ANC? Why is Malema spending so much energy? Why is he willing to take so much criticism and even face legal actions (even though he denies the legitimacy of the Court of Law)? Why doesn’t the leadership of the ANC step up and take control of this situation (I have just read that they are stepping up)? What is the ultimate objective set out by Malema (and maybe the ANC)?
  • susan  - miss
    I really think that the people of this SA must get their facts straight. You know they are all going on and on with whites being rasist, but really think about it people who are really rasist us or the blacks.They must stop with this selfpitty and grow up.....
    It's making me sick to my stomich just to think about all this unneccesery things they are causing. Why don't they just look after our land, and focus on more inportant things like the crimes, foodcosts. Our country is in serious trouble and if our leaders doesn't shape up we are going to where Zimbabwe is now. Do they really want that for our future. War and Hunger???????????????????????
  • ensie  - Further distortion of history
    The almost incomprehensible fact is that the Black people of SA (and Africa)accepted support and education from whites from Europe and up to Russia ,and they believe every word they were told!From that concoction of advisors they were let to believe that the white Europeans in the early days in Africa committed genocide towards the Khoi and San people, while so many millions of them should only have a DNA test to confirm what really happened to the so called extinguised Peoples of this land. The genocide that took place points to only one way and that is the tribes of central Africa who invaded this part of the world and who disposed almost of all the males of the Khoi and San.The numbers killed in clashes with Europeans are almost not worth mentioning if you compared it with what happened to them long before whites started to settle here.
  • Anonymous
    Dear Julius

    As of today I withdraw my former World Cup enthusiasm with active endorsements of all warnings to potential visitors until your leadership rebuke you as we see fit.

    Tomorrow, after you’ve shot the Boere you will still be a pitiful black African living in denial of your own impotence, parading as a fake achiever without contributing to the world a single original idea.

    Yours is mere envy disguised as hatred as nothing you say, wear, drive and steal alas, even your idiocy, is a luxury born of this continent.You must appeal to base sentiment, as Africa has yet to yield a single intellectual, a single thought school, a single intellectual thought not inspired by the very West you and Mugabe detest.

    You have been a phony from the day you set out to champion a defiance from a period you were not even born in.

    You are still consuming from that productive era, living in the lap of luxury thanks to the taxes of the very people you want to shoot, the only tribe to sacrifice a third of its population to breath in the African air.

    In history South Africans will choose to forget you, when the only thing you should be remembered for is you share in the falling short of a brilliant idea: a working South Africa .

    You are a black man. To be proud you must pander to white ideas: you must drive luxury cars, live in expensive hotels, wear suits, be Chris tian, do unions, be Communist, wear wigs, speak English and play soccer.

    Although I know better, you will enforce the stereotype of how Africans are globally viewed... with pity.
  • Anonymous
    IS MALEMA UNTOUCHABLE?
    8 April 2010
    In the wake of right-wing leader Eugene Terre'Blanche's murder, itself
    obviously deeply regrettable, some seriously negative statements have
    been made regarding what is likely to happen in the country. By way
    therefore of a general comment, especially as far as our international
    recipients are concerned, the following:
    South Africa is not about to explode into a race war.
    Overseas tourists planning to visit South Africa have nothing to fear;
    and
    The African World Cup in South Africa is going to happen and is going
    to be a great success.
    Political analyst Steven Friedman, whom we greatly respect, was quite
    right when he said that racial "paranoia" on both sides is responsible
    for fuelling the hysteria over the issue. "South Africa is not on the
    eve of a race war. ........ what we see here is hysteria, where people
    see all kinds of monsters. In the ANC, leaders see white rebellion
    around the corner, and on the white side Julius Malema represents a
    rise of black demagoguery a la Zimbabwe."
    Having said that however, Terre'Blanche's murder, Julius Malema's role
    generally and specifically in relation to the slogan or song he sings
    (kill the boer, kill the farmer), and the government's response to all
    this, do raise concern.
    The Cape Times, in an editorial, attempted, quite mistakenly in my
    view, to draw a clear line between Malema and his song and
    Terre'Blanche's killing. I don't for a moment believe that the "kill
    the boer" slogan had anything to do with Terre'Blanche's murder. In
    other words, I don't believe that it was part of the killers'
    motivation.
    But against the background of more than 3,000 farmers and farm-workers
    having been murdered since 1994, the song - first made public by
    another ANC Youth leader Peter Mokaba fourteen years ago - is
    provocative, intimidating, racist and deeply resented. In fact the
    High Court ruled ten-days ago that it is an incitement to murder. And
    that is how the vast majority of whites - not just Afrikaners and
    farmers - see it. Perhaps the most objectionable aspect of the song
    is the deep resentment and anger which it causes. Regrettably, that
    is not how the government sees it. Two days after Terre'Blanche's
    murder, the ANC issued instructions that the song was not to be sung
    by its members. It nonetheless, instead of taking the sensible option
    and riding with the Court decision banning the song altogether, the
    ANC has chosen to appeal the decision to a higher Court. Just imagine
    how controversial this is bound to be and what pressure it will put on
    the judiciary?
    However, in my opinion much more worrying than Julius Malema's
    inflamming of race relations - and the Institute of Race Relations
    reports a deterioration in race relations over the last few weeks - is
    that Malema represents what almost looks like a determination to
    reassert the national liberation and "struggle" culture in South
    Africa. Modern states, particularly modern democratic societies, are
    well structured; procedures are clearly defined; and there is a clear
    sense of social order. Things don't happen haphazardly.
    What one senses is that Malema and his friends are trying to put in
    place a new paradigm - a national liberation paradigm. This is
    reflected in Malema's deliberate and racially offensive emotional
    statements; and the ideological positions he has adopted over the past
    three months (calling for the nationalisation of mines, then the
    banks, then land, etc.). All of this is irrational without any basis
    in experience and knowledge and at extreme odds with current official
    policy and practice. In fact, its only relationship to reality is its
    connection to power and the masses.
    Malema hinted at this on his recent visit to Harare and Robert Mugabe.
    Relevant here is what he said during his visit. He insisted that he
    was only going to meet with Mugabe's ZANU-PF party, on the basis that
    it was a "struggle" entity. He was not interested in meeting with the
    MDC and Morgan Tsvangirai because, as he put it "it was not part of
    the struggle". (Incidentally, by so openly identifying with Mugabe's
    ZANU-PF, he completely undercut President Zuma and the South African
    government's diplomatic efforts in bringing together the Zimbabwe
    parties.)
    If, as Max du Preez says, Malema has the potential to go to the top,
    and is allowed - unchecked - to pursue this particular path, he will
    very quickly destroy the delicate racial, social, economic and
    political balance which presently exists and which reflects the
    Mandela and Mbeki legacy. And I say indirectly because, given its
    record, the ANC does not seem to have the backbone to stand up to even
    the threat of populism. And this is what, Moeletsi Mbeki, the former
    president's brother and an acutely intelligent person, said in a
    television interview two evenings ago is the biggest threat to our
    democracy and our constitution.
    Denis Worrall,
  • Mourning Democracy  - Julius Malema
    We must understand the predicament the ANC and other "struggle" organizations find themselves in.
    A free people will always choose freedom. The kind of liberty that the fledgling democracy in South Africa produced moved the population further away from the struggle. The struggle is crumbling and falling out of the claws of those who occupy positions of power solely because of the struggle.
    The kind of liberty that South Africa has tasted, not yet experienced, is actually embraced by those people who are eager to live in peace and those who don't have the blood-relationship with the struggle, such as the youth and immigrants.
    The current rulers are losing popularity and justification for being in positions of power, since the struggle is over. They find themselves unable to lead towards economic, moral, and individual prosperity and liberty. All for which they have been groomed, trained, and in which they had success, is to destroy and kill, which is a necessity in a struggle.
    Facing a growing awareness of the population, white and black alike, that its leaders are obstacles to their pursuit of liberty, peace and prosperity, the struggle-leaders are clinging, desperately, to the existence and perpetuity of a struggle.
    Enter stage left: Julius Malema. It fits their strategy that he would be considered stupid or a pawn of some sort. That takes the focus off of the real purpose: maintaining a struggle atmosphere in South Africa is a crucial building block on which justification for the rule of the present leaders can be maintained.
    How would they maintain a struggle when a struggle doesn't exist any longer? Rub salt into the healing wounds of the population. Divide those who are beginning to believe in the effectiveness of the Constitution, pitch the most extreme of the divided against one another and rub more salt.
    Mr. Visagie had a golden opportunity to state his position to the world but he just couldn't let go of the sambok-politics of the past. Perhaps it's a fortunate event in which the world would see where the future lies. It's not with Visagie's style of leadership. It's not with Malema's style of leadership, either. Nor that of Zuma, I dare to say.
    If there were to be fair and free elections in South Africa, free from intimidation and fear, democracy would win in a landslide and the ANC is in a panic about this loss of power. But, be very sure about this, it is a concerted effort to undermine the growing sense and practice of peace, liberty, and prosperity to keep the current powers in power.
    Design your criticism and struggle accordingly, always be civil and knowledgeable about the issues and vote for those candidates who pursue true liberty and prosperity through the free market system.
  • BonnieC  - Unify

    Concentrate on our differences and those differences will divide us.
    Concentrate on our similarities and we will be United as a nation.
  • p  - bugger off
    leave malema alone
  • isaac
    malema did not create racism within the country.
    he is currently - making us aware of the past supremecy.
  • isaac  - kill the boer
    white government did install violence on their youth by sending the youth to the army so that they could come and shoot us the black people.

    to day we work with the whites,study with them and we dont intent to send our black youth to the army.

    black man is very humble and we forgive the whites in the world and still allow them to settle in the continent.

    please whites need to accept that - they have created hatred long before malema.
  • Mourning Democracy  - Kill the boer
    Isaac, You should really study history and not lend you ear to Malema and his destructive politics. Destructive to you and all the people of South Africa.
    The whites (and many blacks, too) fought in the Angolan War because the ANC aligned itself with communist Russia, the U.S.S.R. The war was to prevent communism in SA. That war was lost. SA is ruled by communists today.
    The whites never "hated" the blacks and they still do not hate the blacks today. That's a convenient lie that Malema and other communist organizations are using to whip the blacks' emotions in line to prevent you from participating in the economy and the social structures of the country. Because once you do that, you will be truly free and they cannot afford you to be free.
    You cannot "allow" the whites to settle anywhere. You don't have exclusive rights to Africa. It's another myth to keep you in line perpetrated by the ANC and PAC. You have individual liberty to live where ever you wish, provided you abide by the laws of the country.
    Malema's hate is similar to the hate that Shaka had for his own people who in 1827 killed 7,000 of his own tribe (Zulus) because of his grief at his mother's death. Dingaan, and many others, indiscriminately killed white women and children, just like the British did many years later. It's the principle notion that one person has an entitlement over another that causes holocausts and genocide. The color of one's skin is almost never a cause.
    History proves you wrong on all counts, Isaac. Throw off the bonds of communist slavery. Malema will keep you in bondage as long as you keep him in his multi-million rand life-style. He will kill you the instant you doubt him or touch his money.
Write comment
Your Contact Details:
Comment:
Security
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

Related news items:
Newer news items:
Older news items:

Move
-

Recent Articles

Top Headline

Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe

Mugabe's zero-sum game President Robert Mugabe seems little constrained by the 2008 Global Political Agreement which established the coalition with the Movement for Democratic Change. Governance in Zimbabwe shows that the rule that “you are either with me or against me” continues to be a powerful force in deciding relations between...

Read More...

Final word

Final word

Its not always what you think During the public service strike there was one very clever poster displayed on our TV-screens. In fact it was so clever that it was really a pity that the teacher who had her face framed by a hole in the middle of the poster was not in her class teaching. The poster did, however aptly describe how many...

Read More...

Land grab

Land grab

Africa taken for a ride – again As Mozambique’s capital of Maputo and the city of Matola are experiencing violent riots because of rocketing prices of food and other key consumer goods, a report released in late August by Friends of the Earth...

Read More...

Charting a course through life

Charting a course through life

Success? It’s all in the numbers She is the epitome of the essential new breed of South African woman, and a woman who courageously takes things in her stride. Like coming from a rural Swaziland upbringing to earn several degrees and diplomas; being appointed to more professional and business boards than most people...

Read More...

Food security

Food security

Will Africa feed itself? Africa has a quarter of the world's arable land but produces only a tenth of our food. On the eve of a pan-African conference on food security, Lindiwe Sibanda asks how African farmers can turn things round, and what questions and answers you have when facing the huge challenges of maintaining and increasing...

Read More...
Leadership magazine is South Africa's number one award winning business magazine having won the Tabbie Gold Award for Best Single Issue in the world (TABPI), PICA Awards for Magazine of the Year, Best Publication, Editor of the Year, Cover Design

The Leadership Bullentin


Archive